View Poll Results: Whats your favorite?

Voters
73. You may not vote on this poll
  • Classic

    61 83.56%
  • Santana

    12 16.44%
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 42

Thread: Classic Headstock Vs. Santana headstock

  1. #21
    Senior Member veinbuster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    GTA, or PA, or vacation
    Posts
    2,371
    I didn't vote. I have both and like the guitars that they are on.
    That said, the pointy one is clearly recognizable as PRS and that is what I would expect by default.

  2. #22
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Yardley, PA
    Posts
    51
    I like both, but I really like the Santana on SCs.
    SC245s

  3. #23
    Bobble Head Moderator JMintzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Potomac, MD
    Posts
    1,387
    Like Les, I really like the Santana headstock on the acoustics and think it looks great on the Ted Singlecuts...


    Jamie
    ---Jamie---

    My Gear

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by LSchefman View Post
    How is that a bad thing?
    I just keep getting distracted!

  5. #25
    Angry Southern Gentleman Hopeful Sinner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    1,429
    Voted Classic, but love the Santana on Acoustic models and think it fits the Santana Sig guitar better than the Classic of course...
    -Jon

    "I'm a sinner and I hope I never change"

  6. #26
    PRS Addiction CoreyT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Auburn, WA. USA
    Posts
    2,774
    I voted classic, but you know I never knew the Santana model had a different shaped headstock.
    I just assumed it was like the classic shape like I have on my 2012 SE Santana until I saw this thread here.
    I have seen many pics of a Maryland built Santana, but just never paid attention that it had a different shape.

  7. #27
    Hi. I'm naked. Aldwyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Columbia, Maryland
    Posts
    155
    Classic. When you look at the classic headstock, there is no doubt if it's a PRS or not.

    Though my two favorite guitars at the moment (and have been for years) are my Teds... both with the Santana headstock! :-o

  8. #28
    Member RichardJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    The land of wine and cheese
    Posts
    182
    Classic for me. When I see it it says PRS, in the same way that the 'other guys' protect their headstock shapes as being part of their brand. I like the Santana shape, but see it as part of the Santana signature look.

  9. #29
    Senior Member Sage's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    381
    I like them both, but the Classic is the original PRS headstock. It's very distinctive. However, it's also very modern-looking, and that pointy style evokes hard rock/metal more than other styles of music. The Santana headstock has more of a universal styling to it, but the downside is that it's not terribly distinctive.

    I prefer the Classic. It's just what I'm used to, its on all my PRS guitars (including the SE Angelus) and it makes a statement.

  10. #30
    Senior Member 11top's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,674
    I like both, but I voted for classic.
    Sh*tter's full

  11. #31
    Senior Member MA Pete's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    478
    I like them both.

    The "Classic" one is the PRS look with the history of the Customs and the McCarty. I am glad I did the PRS headstock on my Aquamarine DC 245 Signature PS, it looks great!



    This guitar has become my favorite to play, and especially to gig with, with the great 6 pound weight, the great ergonomic package of the DC 245 (my favorite!!), and the awesome 408 pickups.

    Agree with the statements here that the SC 245 Ted's look better with the Santana headstock, more of a historical G***** look.



    But given my 3+ love affair with the DC 245 Ted, I even dig the Santana headstock on the DC shape. While the "Classic" PRS headstock looks more at home on a Doublecut PRS shape, a la Custom 24, Custom 22, McCarty, to me the Santana headstock shape is part of what signals that particular DC is a DC 245 Ted, which makes it special and different.

    This one on my Jade Glow DC Ted is fairly subtle, as there is no binding or purfling on it, while the SC 245 above pops more because it has the binding. The DC and SC in the oven have the Santana shape and both have purfling around the headstock, which will make it more obvious that they have the Santana headstock shape.



    Of course the Santana headstock looks pretty good on a Santana as well!



    So when my 2 Private Stock's in the oven come in, looks like my collection will be 5 of 6 with the Santana headstock, but the one pointy one will be the "Number One" go-to gigging guitar. Weird!
    Ted Club President

  12. #32
    Love Boat Captain butterfly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    247
    I'm in the horses for courses camp. The classic for the McCarty, CU 22 and 24, the Santana for the Santana and the Ted's, especially the SCs Teds. Drop a Santana headstock on a stripped 58 and I would sing songs of joy and contentment.

  13. #33
    Senior Member vchizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    WI
    Posts
    2,458
    Classic. It's original. That Santana headstock is kind of generic. It looks good, I like it on the acoustics but give me classic 99% of the time.

  14. #34
    Senior Member garrett's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    936
    Classic in general for electrics.
    Santana on the acoustics.

    I thought the Mira LTD was super cool with the Santana headstock, though:

    --Garrett--

  15. #35
    Senior Member jcha008's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    461
    I like both as well, but the classic wins for me. But the Santana stock looks great with his signature model, and the acoustics. I really like them on the acoustics actually.

  16. #36
    Member Gibson67v's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta
    Posts
    157
    Classic is more recognizable than the santana... but both are wicked designs!
    Custom 22 Brazilian Limited (Emerald Green/Artist Package Quilt)| Custom 24 (Red Fire Burst/Quilted 10 Top)| Custom 24 (Autumn Sky) | P22 (Solana Burst)| Standard 22 (TriColor Burst)| McCarty Soapbar (Seafoam Green)| CE 22 (Vintage Yellow/3 piece 10 Top)| CE 22 (Whale Blue)| Mesa Dual Rectifier Half Stack| Fender Blues DeVille 410 (USA Made)| Fender Evil Twin (Snakeskin)| Peavey Classic 50 410| Gibson Northern Jumbo Limited

  17. #37
    Senior Member gush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    washington iowa
    Posts
    646
    I cant get into the santana headstock. I think the classic headstock looks great and is easy to spot. I dont think I would buy a prs with santana headstock. Remember, this is just my opinion.

  18. #38
    Member dmatthews's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C. Canada
    Posts
    146
    When I go to visit my pusher... cough... I mean guitar store, I scan by headstock first.
    I like both types but the classic pops visually for me first.
    2001 PRS McRosie Violin Amber Sunburst Abalone birdies
    2008 PRS Mira Vintage Orange with old MOP birdies
    2009 PRS 305 Tri Colour Burst
    2009 PRS SE ONE autographed by Dweezil Zappa
    2011 PRS H combo amp

  19. #39
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    6
    Santana

  20. #40
    Junior Member SunDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    7
    When I first noticed PRS guitars - the headstock was kind of off putting - mainly because it reminded me of the Guild X-79 Skyhawk that floated around MTV in the early to mid 80s:

    https://www.google.com/search?q=guil...w=1486&bih=698

    Never liked the look of those much.

    Put me in the preferring the Santana style group.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •